Mississippi PEP Reader: Doesn’t the SCOTUS definition of the individual mandate as a “tax” invalidate the whole of ObamaCare?


The following is a message shared by a Mississippi PEP reader. Maybe we can get a constitutional attorney to chime in here.

Please forgive the vanity but I have to share this… I could be wrong, but I don’t think I am.

Article 1, Section 7 of the U.S. Constitution: “All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.

IIRC, the House barely passed a version of Obamacare and the Senate passed a version of their own. The House version hit a roadblock in the Senate. The Dems pulled the Senate version from reconciliation and “deemed” it passed rather than risking another vote in the House.

I bring this up because I’ve seen a number of threads today regarding states and AGs reviewing the ruling. If I’m correct in my analysis, the SCOTUS just invalidated the whole law by declaring it a tax which did not originate in the House. Please pass this on to your elected representatives.

About these ads

3 Comments

Filed under Obamacare

3 Responses to Mississippi PEP Reader: Doesn’t the SCOTUS definition of the individual mandate as a “tax” invalidate the whole of ObamaCare?

  1. Pingback: How Can a Conservative Support a RINO For President? « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  2. Pingback: Rise Up! | The Busy Post

  3. Pingback: The Obama/Roberts Doctrine of Christian Rewards/Punishments (SCOTUS opened a Pandora’s box of taxes) « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s