In a 5-3 vote, the state Ethics Commission cleared six Republican lawmakers who had potential conflicts of interest to vote on Medicaid funding, reauthorization and against expanding the program on Friday morning.
Gov. Phil Bryant and the legislative GOP leadership hope the lawmakers – who had abstained from voting because they work for Medicaid providers – will give them enough votes to end a legislative stalemate that threatens to shut Medicaid down July 1.
The six GOP House members who didn’t vote and requested Ethics opinions are: Donnie Bell, who does PR for a hospice provider; Bubba Carpenter, a paramedic; Becky Currie, a nurse for a home-health company; Mac Huddleston, a veterinarian who’s married to a doctor; Sam Mims, who does marketing for a regional health firm; and Margaret Rogers, whose father is a retired doctor.
An Ethics opinion doesn’t bind a lawmaker, but following it would provide them legal cover. Failing to follow an opinion’s advice could set them up for legal action and fines from the commission or courts.
The Ethics ruling appears to contradict one from 2012, which said lawmakers who work for private Medicaid providers should not vote on Medicaid funding and regulations.
But supporters of Friday’s ruling said it matches one from 2005, which allows lawmakers whose spouses or other family members are teachers to vote on education issues and funding.
And a state Supreme Court ruling from 2002 said two lawmakers who were pharmacists and received money from Medicaid could vote on the program.
Ethics Director Tom Hood and Ethics Commission Chairman Ben Stone noted before Friday’s vote that ruling against the lawmakers voting on Medicaid would require the commission to go back and do the same for lawmakers with family members who are educators.





