Tag Archives: Barack Obama

Managing Editor Keith Plunkett to be on The JT Show Tuesday at noon to discuss latest in the Medicaid fight.


Mississippi PEP’s Managing Editor Keith Plunkett will be on the JT Show at noon Tuesday to discuss the latest developments in the Medicaid expansion versus reauthorization debate. Listen in or find your local station HERE.

To learn more by reading Mississippi PEP’s many articles on the subject of Medicaid, go to our latest Newsletter.

Newsletter: The Many Layers of the Medicaid Debate

Leave a Comment

Filed under Education, Entitlements, Federal Government, health, Insurance, Keith Plunkett, Legislature, Medicaid, Mississippi, Obamacare, Politics, State Government

Advocates on statewide tour to push for Medicaid expansion.


Mississippi Health Care Access, a coalition that includes medical providers, religious groups and others interested in the state’s health care issues, will host a public hearing Thursday night in Tupelo on Medicaid expansion.

The meeting will be held at 6 p.m. at the Link Centre on West Main in Tupelo. A similar meeting will be held at the same time at the Oxford Conference Center on Ed Perry Boulevard.

According to a news release by the group, other meetings will be scheduled across the state to discuss the option to expand Medicaid to provide health care to those earning up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level or about $15,000 annually for an individual.

Read More

1 Comment

Filed under Democrats, Ethics, health, Legislature, Medicaid, Mississippi, Obamacare, Politics, State Government

Coalition tours the state to push disproved theories of Medicaid expansion.


According to the (Mississippi Health Care Access) Coalition’s studies presented at Saturday’s forum (in Hattiesburg), if the state expands its Medicaid program more than 9,000 new jobs will be created in Mississippi by 2020, and the state will save money by reducing the amount of money it spends on emergency room care for the uninsured.

Panelist John Whitfield said Medicaid expansion would help Mississippi save money in the long run.

“An unhealthy society is a society that is not going to be productive,” Whitfield said. “If I have insurance, I’m more likely to engage in preventive care. And if I engage in preventive care, I’m more likely than not going to find those problems early on that, if not taken care of right, then will become more costly and not just costly financially, but costly from a health prospective.”

Whitfield, who serves as the associate minister at D’Iberville’s Tabernacle Missionary Baptist Church, said the only way an honest, open discussion about Medicaid expansion will occur in the Legislature is if the people of Mississippi voice their desire for it.

Read More

Leave a Comment

Filed under Democrats, Entitlements, Ethics, Federal Government, health, Legislature, Medicaid, Mississippi, Obamacare, Politics, State Government

Previously suspected ricin mailer Kevin Curtis’ Attorney says charges have been dropped.


This story has had so many twists and turns of late they are difficult to keep track of.

  • Everett Dutschke, a former candidate for House District 16 in 2007 who ran against Steve Holland, and apparently caused a ruckus in Verona a few years ago, was implicated yesterday.
  • His house was searched today.
  • Then they let Curtis go.
  • Now they’ve dropped the charges.
  • A press conference is set to happen any minute.

The Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal is keeping up with developing events.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Letter sent to Roger Wicker tests positive for ricin.


U.S. Senator Roger Wicker (R-MS) photo from co...

U.S. Senator Roger Wicker (R-MS) photo from congressional bioguide from 109th COngress (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

An envelope sent to an office of Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) included a substance that has tested positive for Ricin, two sources say.

It was not immediately clear when the envelope was received or whether it was sent to his Washington, D.C., office or a field office.

via Politico

3 Comments

Filed under Federal Government, Law Enforcement, Mississippi

Plunkett: DSH payments will never be cut. Dems should vote to reauthorize Medicaid now.


BY: B. Keith Plunkett @Keithplunkett

With one single decision President Barack Obama pulled the rug out from under any moves by Mississippi Democrats to expand Medicaid in Mississippi. In fact, he pulled the rug out from under the supporters of expansion in all the states who have yet to decide to expand the program. He also began the slippery slide into the undoing of his own signature achievement as President, ObamaCare, something that was inevitable.

On Wednesday the Obama Administration blinked in the face of the huge number of states who have outright rejected any form of Medicaid expansion by delaying cuts to  DSH payments to states. 23 refused participation at last count.

DSH, or “dish”, payments are given to hospitals by the federal government to states through Medicaid for caring for the uninsured.

What the administration has done is basically admit that these payments to hospitals will never end, something that would have been eventually learned through a court order had the cuts actually been attempted. Back in June of 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that states had the legal authority to reject expansion and the federal government could do nothing to penalize states for it. The exact language in the ruling says:

“What Congress is not free to do is to penalize States that choose not to participate in that new program by taking away their existing Medicaid funding.”

As Governor Phil Bryant has been saying all along, DSH payments are part of that existing funding. To remove the payments would be a violation of the ruling.

The Obama Administration and the Department of Health and Human Services has been working on a piecemeal approach with states for the past several months to convince them to participate, because without states buying-in to Medicaid expansion the whole house of cards that is ObamaCare comes tumbling down. Seeing the handwriting on the wall, President Obama decided to give himself a time-out on Wednesday to reassess.

That reassessment will not likely lead to an admission of a mistake by the President, nor is it likely to bring two sides to the table for a “do-over” on health care. It’s more likely that both sides will continue to point fingers at the other while ObamaCare slowly turns into yet another ineffective behemoth federal program that mostly serves the bureaucrats who implement it.

The simple truth is that this was always a game of chicken about full-out government takeover of the health care industry, and states who rejected the expansion have won this round. DSH payments were never going to be cut. One only need to look at the SGR and the annual “Doc Fix” under Medicare to see a perfect example of why.

The SGR is the acronym for the Medicare Sustainable Growth Rate. Enacted by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, SGR is the method by which the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services attempts to control spending by Medicare on physician services.

Every year Congress gets a report on the needed SGR cuts to physician payments for the following year to match the target. Virtually every year, cries of cuts to medical services erupt and Congress suspends, adjusts or delays the cuts.

Congressmen won’t make those cuts for the very reason they won’t make DSH cuts, they would be targeted in their home districts for voting against providing health care to the most needy. It’s political suicide.

ObamaCare’s entire premise is that it will produce deficit savings as more people share in the risk of health coverage for all. The prediction was that as more uninsured enter into the Medicaid system via expansion, the cost of care would go down. New CBO and IRS projections clearly show that to be a utopian fantasy. Instead of decreasing, premiums have steadily risen, and participation has not increased.

With only two and half years left for President Obama, it will be necessary to pull out all the stops to get to the next logical “big government” step, one that was always in the cards. They’ll say that since the quasi-government system isn’t working, we need single-payer, a full government takeover of the health care system.

Mississippi Democrats want you to think that DSH cuts are coming. The latest attempts have been to assert that since the cuts are delayed, they will be more severe when they happen. Therefore, we should expand Medicaid now. That is just a last gasp for House Democrats to pretend this entire charade has meaning. It doesn’t. It never did.

House Democratic leadership should get to the table immediately with hat in hand and agree to reauthorization of Mississippi’s Medicaid program so that services to the most needy Mississippians aren’t interrupted.

Whether Democrat Legislators are willing to admit to what’s on the scoreboard or not, this games over.

About Keith: Keith Plunkett has worked on communications issues with a range of public officials from aldermen to Congressmen, and a variety of businesses, governmental agencies and non-profits. He serves or has served as a board member of several non-profit, civic and political organizations. Contact him by going to HorizonMediaMarketing.com or follow him on Twitter @Keithplunkett

7 Comments

Filed under Democrats, Entitlements, Federal Government, Governor, health, Keith Plunkett, Legislature, Medicaid, Mississippi, Mississippi State House, Obamacare, Opinion, Phil Bryant, Politics, Republican, Spending, State Government

Lawmaker discussion shows divide on Medicaid expansion.


Democratic Sen. David Blount, of Jackson, said adding an estimated 300,000 people to Medicaid — most of them working poor — makes sense because Mississippi would receive billions of federal dollars over 10 years, and that money would support health care jobs.

“We ought to recognize a good deal when we see it,” Blount told about 35 people during luncheon sponsored by the Capitol press corps and Mississippi State University’s Stennis Institute of Government.

Republican Rep. Andy Gipson, of Braxton, said the state can’t afford to pay its share of expansion, and he doesn’t believe federal money is guaranteed.

Under the federal health overhaul that President Barack Obama signed into law in 2010, the federal government will pay 100 percent of medical expenses for the newly qualified Medicaid enrollees from 2014 to 2017. The federal share would be reduced to 90 percent by 2020, with each state paying the balance.

“Knowing that the federal government may pay for a portion of it for the next two or three years is not enough comfort for me to go ahead and say, ‘You know, let’s expand this and take on the whole program,’” Gipson said. “Certainly, we don’t have the funds to do that.”

The federal law says states have the option to expand Medicaid to people making 138 percent of the federal poverty level. That’s an income of about $15,000 for one person. In Mississippi now, the income cutoff to enroll is about $5,500 for one person, and the state program does not cover many able-bodied adults, regardless of income.

Read More

Leave a Comment

Filed under Andy Gipson, Budget, David Blount, Democrats, Entitlements, Federal Government, health, Legislature, Medicaid, Mississippi, Mississippi State House, Mississippi State Senate, Opinion, Politics, Public Service, Republican, State Government

Underwood: Economic Freedom is the message conservatives should be pushing.


20130403-104829.jpg

BY: Ian Underwood @IUnder22

20130319-171746.jpg

After the previous election conservatives all across the country have taken a step back to reflect on the loss and many have begun to reevaluate the messages and the tone in which we as conservatives presented them. Everyone has their opinion; some say we should move more to the middle on many issues to adapt to the ever-changing demographics of the nation, while others claim we were not conservative enough.

I, like many others in the conservative movement firmly believe that we must become the movement of ideas rather than being simply anti-liberal.

For example, conservatives in the 2012 election were firmly against the Affordable Care Act or as known by it’s popular name “ObamaCare”. We vowed to repeal what we believe to be a deeply flawed piece of legislation, but we never offered a great idea to replace it. We simply morphed into the anti-Obama movement. This was seen by independents as petty. The conservative movement is at its best when it is offering up ideas. The ideas that conservatives win on are economics and the power of the free market.

The economy is a very complex idea to explain. As a young conservative I often find it frustrating to try and distill the subject into a message that is easily explainable. In the age of Twitter and Facebook attention spans of my generation are shorter than ever. So how do we present the message to younger Americans? We have to paint a contrasting picture of the two very different ideas. What propels economic prosperity? Is it big government spending or a flourishing and robust private sector?

As a conservative that answer is easy, because we believe that it is imperative for the private sector to create the jobs for all hard working Americans. We believe while government may play a small role in some regulations, they should not oppress business owners with bureaucratic over-regulation and increased taxing. The idea that big government spending will lead us to economic prosperity is completely false. We as conservatives must hammer away with our message of opportunity and prosperity, not the movement of austerity.

What most resonates with younger people are jobs, and while this was a theme of the 2012 election, I don’t think we did a very effective job in presenting this in a simple message. The number of young Americans that voted to reelect the President clearly proves that. We allowed ourselves to get caught up in distractions, and President Obama did a great job in pinning the current economic woes to his predecessor. Again we came away as the “old mean conservatives.”

In my time at college I have witnessed students being moved by social issues such as personhood and abortion. However when it comes to the issue that will perhaps affect them the most, the economy, many are simply unengaged. It is just too complex of an issue to fire them up. With liberal rhetoric of the wealthy paying their “fair share” even some conservatives think, “well yeah they should”, not knowing what the government even considers as “wealthy”. This is where conservative students must stand up and grab hold of the conversation and combat the rhetoric.

Just this past month, I read John Meacham’s Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power. While reading I could not help but notice the importance that our founding fathers like Jefferson put on public knowledge of government affairs. Jefferson believed that without citizen’s interest in the workings of their government, democracy could not flourish. Jefferson wrote “ Do not be too severe upon [the people’s] errors, but reclaim them by enlightening them. If once they become inattentive to the public affairs, you and I, and Congress, and assemblies, judges and governors shall become wolves.”

This is what we as young conservatives must do to “reclaim by enlightening”. On campus and everywhere we engage young Americans, we have to combat liberal bias, because many in our generation will not do the research on their own. Most will may flip through MSNBC, CNN, or FOX on their way to their favorite reality TV show without ever looking at the facts. We have to present these ideas in a conversational and simple message.

The young people in the conservative movement are passionate about jobs and growth. We believe that citizens know best how to spend their money and run their business, and that a robust private sector leads to a prosperous America.

That message should take priority.

About Ian: Ian Underwood is a graduate of Mississippi College with a degree in History. He is the current Executive Director of the Mississippi Federation of College Republicans and a co-founder of Generation Mississippi. He is from Pascagoula, Mississippi. Follow him on Twitter @IUnder22

Leave a Comment

Filed under contributor, Generation Mississippi, History, Mississippi, Opinion, Politics, Republican

Rep. Steve Holland calls Gov. Bryant a “fool” for not expanding Medicaid.


Rep. Steve Holland, D-Plantersville, is a former chairman of the House Public Health Committee. He said expanding Medicaid would provide coverage for people who work hard but can’t afford insurance. He also said expansion would support thousands of health care jobs.

“I think you’re a fool to turn your back on the working poor,” Holland said in a hand-written note he was delivering to the governor Monday. “Plus, you’re a hypocrite to promote medical economic development and not have this means to pay for it. This is simple minded on your part.”

Holland was using “means” as a synonym for “way,” which is typical in legislative language.

Holland closed the note by saying to Bryant: “Get a life.” Holland’s signature included a smiley face, which he often uses on official documents, but he said the criticism is serious.

Under a federal health overhaul that President Barack Obama signed into law in 2010, states have the option of expanding Medicaid to people making up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level, or about $15,000 for an individual. Mississippi’s current cutoff is about $5,500, and the state’s program doesn’t cover many able-bodied adults.

In a recent letter to Holland and other lawmakers, Bryant wrote: “Even a cursory glance at the state’s budget will reveal that Mississippi simply does not have the resources for such expenditures. So, which government functions are you willing to cut and what taxes are you willing to levy upon your district to pay for a new entitlement?”

Read More

3 Comments

Filed under Budget, Democrats, Entitlements, Governor, Legislature, Medicaid, Mississippi, Mississippi State House, Phil Bryant, Politics, Republican, State Government

Supreme Court will consider challenge to Section 5 of Voting Rights Act


In an order Friday, the justices agreed to hear a constitutional challenge to the part of the landmark Voting Rights Act that requires all or parts of 16 states with a history of discrimination in voting to get federal approval before making any changes in the way they hold elections.

The high court considered the same issue three years ago but sidestepped what Chief Justice John Roberts then called “a difficult constitutional question.”

The new appeal from Shelby County, Ala., near Birmingham, says state and local governments covered by the law have made significant progress and no longer should be forced to live under oversight from Washington.

“The America that elected and reelected Barack Obama as its first African-American president is far different than when the Voting Rights Act was first enacted in 1965. Congress unwisely reauthorized a bill that is stuck in a Jim Crow-era time warp. It is unconstitutional,” said Edward Blum, director of the not-for-profit Project on Fair Representation, which is funding the challenges to the voting rights law and affirmative action.

Read More

Related Articles:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Entitlements, Ethics, Federal Government, Law Enforcement, Politics